ThoughtProcess

Automatic organization that reflects your thinking

Annotate passages, leave notes in the margin, start collaborative task-specific threads. Create a map of your team's perspective that goes beyond a generic document dump, making it easy to return to and easy to apply AI when you need it.

Tools to systemize firm-specific reasoning

  • Annotations
    Highlight and annotate specific passages from your sources. No more scribbling down ideas to see them lost in a folder: everything is instantly retrievable with semantic search or AI recollection.
  • Task-specific threads
    Create dedicated threads that track all of the supporting material and discussion that goes into nuanced work products.
  • Citations
    Pin a claim to the exact location of its supporting evidence. Every citation opens directly to its passage.
  • Ready for synthesis
    When you need them, our AI tools are built to focus on the ideas and connections you've developed over the duration of a project, rather than giving a generic summary.

Everything where you need it

Notes, discussion, writing, and search results stay alongside the sources they pertain to. When you need to pull up hard-won insights from past projects, everything you need is right at hand and ready for AI integration.

Built for comprehensive analysis

For complex, long-running projects, generic AI with a dump of files does not have the full context it needs. We help bridge the gap with a workspace that turns deliberative, collaborative work into AI-ready structure for your documents and ideas.

Flag relevant sections of sources, add notes, discuss with collaborators. Your thinking stays with the relevant documents rather than getting lost in email or chat threads.

Mark up sources as you read, or dig in with collaborators and AI. Cited sections are stored to be pulled up in their full original context.

Everything is searchable and ready for AI integration. Pull up what you need by asking about it in the way you actually think about it.

Focused AI

Our AI tools are built for comprehensive recollection and synthesis of your own work. Models are equipped with the structure that you build up over the course of a project, so AI responses are relevant to how your team actually uses your material.

Build rich, team-specific context.

←Semantic search
AI & MCP→
ThoughtProcess
Product
  • Collections
  • Search
  • Structure
  • AI & MCP
  • Writing
  • Collaboration
Resources
  • Security
  • Deployment
  • Getting started
Company
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Privacy & Terms
© Thought Process Software, LLC.info@thoughtprocess.us
ACME Inc. - FY26 review
AISearchSources
Upload

Sources

New folder
  • 10-K ACME Inc.Details
    JJakeJake· added March 4, 2026
    1 notein 2 documents1 threadin 2 searches
    You · March 16, 2026
    1

    Margin bridge doesn’t reconcile with the segment tables. Pull the Q2 10-Q before this goes out.

    Linked sections
  • ACME Inc. 10-Q - Q2 2026
  • ACME Inc. earnings call - Q2 2026 transcript
  • Margin analysis
    • Ridgeline Research - ACME downgrade to hold
    • Meridian Partners - ACME channel checks, Q1Details
      JJohnJohn· added May 21, 2026
      1 notein 1 document1 threadin 3 searches
    • Cost basket
      • BLS producer price index - industrial inputs
      • Segment margin bridge - working model
NotesSearch

10-K ACME Inc.

Results of Operations. Net revenue for fiscal 2026 was $4.31 billion, an increase of 2.4% over fiscal 2025. Growth in the Commercial segment was partially offset by lower volumes in Industrial, where unit shipments declined 5.8%.

Cost of goods sold increased 6.5% to $2.71 billion. As a result, gross margin declined 240 basis points year over year, driven primarily by higher input costs and, to a lesser extent, competitive pricing pressure in the Industrial segment.

Input cost pressure was concentrated in resins, fabricated steel, and inbound freight. The Company has entered into forward purchase commitments covering a portion of its fiscal 2027 requirements and expects the benefit of those commitments to be realized ratably over the year.

The Company does not disclose price and volume detail at the segment level. Management believes that segment operating results, together with the discussion above, provide sufficient information to evaluate the performance of the business.

Selling, general and administrative expense was 18.2% of net revenue, compared with 18.4% in the prior year. Operating income declined 8.2% to $816 million, and operating margin was 18.9%, compared with 21.1% in fiscal 2025.